| |
|
| |
| DETAILS |
|
|
In a venture market where nearly $50B flowed into defense tech last year alone, capital is no longer the constraint, proof is.nDeep tech founders face a harder question: Does your system actually survive, adapt, & deliver in modern large-scale combat operations?nSGA, through our in country deployment & testing program, will help you answer that question under real conditions, not simulated exercises. We bring U.S. deep tech companies into Ukraine for controlled evaluation with LSCO-experienced operators, battalion & brigade leadership, & specialized training units. Participants can test in advanced training environments with Ukrainian combat veterans or, where appropriate, deploy in proximity to or in active frontline units for true operational feedback.nUnlike Western exercises that lack adaptive adversaries, dense EW environments, artillery saturation, & contested logistics, Ukraine offers a modern battlefield laboratory. Systems are evaluated for survivability, integration friction, human factors, & mission impact. Founders receive structured operator feedback, performance data, & validation documentation suitable for U.S. DoD stakeholders, primes, & investors.nThis is not a tour. It is a rigorously coordinated engagement including export control review, vetted end-user access, secure logistics, & defined success metrics. Technologies are matched to real mission profiles. Data is captured. Lessons are documented. Follow-on pathways domestically, SBIRs, programs of record, prime integration, Nato & Ukraine revenue, are mapped in parallel.nFor deep tech companies building autonomy, EW, robotics, ISR, secure comms, energy, cyber, or advanced materials, this program provides what no lab or CONUS range can: credible, combat-informed validation. In todays capital environment, combat credibility is is a procurement & fundraising accelerant.nThis event will explain how your technology can prove it belongs, & to return with the data, relationships, & operational pedigree your competitors do not have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
